Stage 6 · Public Proposal & Data Feedback · Case #2026-DF-CED
Cedar Bend
Fast-growing exurb with chronic water stress; school district under-funded.
Live Votes
49%
346 votes · 169 yes · 122 no · 55 edits
Approval Prediction
85%
forecast from design + incentives
Direct Benefits to Residents
$311
Annualized benefit per household
55%
Local hiring commitment
$4M
Public parks grant
6%
Revenue share to schools
$120/yr
Broadband subsidy per HH
$80/yr
Energy credit per HH
18%
Property tax to municipality
$2M
Water conservation fund
Project Design Commitments
- · Building footprint capped at 1.2M sq ft on 280 acres.
- · 150 ft setback from all property lines.
- · Cooling system: closed-loop (no draw on local water supply).
- · 40% renewable energy mix.
- · 60% noise-damping wall system at perimeter.
- · 50% vegetative screening density.
Voting is limited to verified residents of Williamson County.
Resident Priorities Vote
Tell the developer and the county which trade-offs matter most to you. Live tallies feed directly into the Community Benefit Agreement and the permit application.
Energy & utility bills
What matters most for your electric bill?
Water
How should the project handle water?
Public spaces
Pick the public space investment that helps your family most.
Schools
Where should education dollars land?
Jobs & local economy
What hiring commitment matters most?
Noise, traffic & nights
Pick the nuisance protection that hits closest to home.
Verify residency above to cast your vote
Community Comments (3)
LJ
Lina J.
Resident
If you draw from the Brazos during a drought year there will be a referendum. Closed-loop is non-negotiable.
PN
P. Nguyen
Teacher
School revenue share would let us hire 8 teachers. That's transformative.
HS
Henry S.
Resident
Tax share to the city is good, but residents want direct relief too. Increase the energy credit.